Trophy Room Card Grading is a newer name in the AI grading space, but its leadership comes from a much older tradition. The company is owned by Austin Hutto, a career coin grader who worked at PCGS Coins (PSA Cards) and NGC Coins (CGC Cards), and it operates as a sister company to ICG Coins. That makes Trophy Room, in the words of its president, "the third of its kind built off an established coin grading body."
We spoke with President Adam Hall about what the company's AI actually measures, how a grade is reached, and what collectors should do before they submit. His answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
Question 1: What does your AI grading process actually measure on a card, and how does that differ from what a human grader looks at?
Hall says the AI evaluates the same four categories that human graders use: centering, edges, corners, and surface. These are the standard regions used across the hobby, and they are the same areas that services like CGC Cards and Edge Grading break out in their published scales.
The difference, according to Hall, is consistency. "Grader to grader variance is real. Our system evaluates every card using the same scope and parameters." He adds that "the AI will not have an off day and our customers can rely on it to provide consistency every time."
That framing matters for collectors who have sent the same card to different services and received different results. Human grading depends on the individual grader's judgment, and even skilled graders can weigh a soft corner or a print line differently from one another.
Ready to Grade Your Cards?
This is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional grading advice.
Connect with Trophy Room Card Grading, our featured expert, to discuss your card grading needs. Complete the short questionnaire to share your situation and receive a personalized reply.
Question 2: Collectors often worry that AI grading is a black box. What can you tell them about how a grade is reached and what they can see afterward?
Hall describes a process where each scanned card is compared against millions of examples already stored in the system. The AI then assigns a grade on a 1–10 scale for each of the four categories, including 0.5 increments. That scan is added back into the database, which the company says actively learns and refines its recognition over time.
Trophy Room also offers a top designation called a "Grail" 10. "To receive a Grail, a card would need to receive perfect 10 grades across all four subcategories." After cards are returned, submitters can look up their card by certification number for verification in the database. Hall notes that a more detailed grade-tracking system is in development.
For collectors used to a single overall number, the four-category breakdown is the more useful part. It shows where a card lost points rather than just how far it fell.
Question 3: Austin came from coin grading at PCGS and NGC, and Trophy Room is a sister company to ICG. What did that background change about how you built the card grading side?
Hall points to two problems the company set out to address: cost per card and turnaround time. "The prices per card are prohibitive for the average collector, and the turnaround time on getting grades back is a nightmare to plan around."
Trophy Room positions itself for both high-value submissions and everyday collectors who simply want a favorite card in a slab for display. Hall says Austin's direction and industry knowledge give the team confidence that this framework is one collectors will grow into as they submit more regularly.
Question 4: Where do you see the biggest inconsistency in card grading today, and how does your process address it?
Hall is direct about the problem: "The biggest inconsistency in card grading today is the unreliability of the grade you receive from professional graders." He notes that submitters pay top dollar expecting fair and consistent results, but wide variance can show up from one submission to the next. He also raises the resubmission issue — some services, he says, cannot detect when a card has already been graded and may return a different result the second time.
Trophy Room's answer is that its AI recognizes any card resubmitted through its process. "The grade that you receive the first time in a TRCG slab will be the same grade that card receives if resubmitted." That is a testable claim, and collectors can verify it by looking up certification numbers in the database.
Question 5: What should a collector do before submitting a card, and what most often causes a submission to come back lower than they expected?
Hall's advice starts with eye appeal. "Plainly, does the card look exceptional in quality?" Before submitting, he suggests evaluating cards under good lighting and paying close attention to centering and corners first, since those tend to stand out immediately. Then check for whitening along the edges, front and back. Finally, tilt the card in the light to catch surface imperfections.
Much of what the system evaluates, he notes, is information a collector can see with a little effort. For cards they are unsure about, Trophy Room offers a minimum grade option: the company will only grade and slab cards that meet the minimum, charging a $5 reject fee for any that fall below it.
That option is worth knowing about, because the most common disappointment in grading is a card that looked clean in hand but showed a flaw under magnification. A minimum grade does not improve the card, but it can prevent a submission from turning into a slab you did not want.
For collectors comparing services, the practical takeaways from this conversation are straightforward: understand the four categories, inspect your cards under good light before submitting, and ask any grading company how it handles resubmissions and grade verification. Trophy Room's answers on those points are specific, and collectors can test them against their own results. You can learn more about the service at Trophy Room Card Grading.